DEEPA GUMASTHE joins the debate on Naxalism on TheVigil:
We cannot expect marginalised people to adhere to democratic processes when the democracy they live in offers them absolutely no benefits. I think the key statement in her (Shoma Chaudhury’s) analysis was that these people seem to prefer a gruesome death to slow starvation and acute deprivation.
Perhaps the state and the media need to try and understand why they think this way. I really believe that failure to provide for the basic needs of the country’s poorest is the biggest failure of India’s democracy.
I think what Shoma also suggests through Arnab Goswami’s example — though I think it cuts across channels and media — is the absolute callousness of the urban media towards the issues of rural India. I see it as a reflection of the apathy of the middle and upper classes to the voiceless masses. To think the so-called issues we sit and debate on prime time news is whether Rahul Gandhi should have travelled by train or not, whether Shashi Tharoor should be allowed to describe economy class travel as cattle class or not, whether Air India pilots should get paid Rs. 3 lakh or Rs. 6 lakh, whether Shivaji’s statue should be built or not!
When was the last time we saw a prime-time debate on the issue of the drought and the impact it will have, not on the prices of Tur Dal in Mumbai or Delhi, but on the mere survival of crores of Indians? I remember watching one discussion on the subject on NDTV two months ago.
Perhaps all this seems like ineffective ranting, but the truth is, we as the media have no conscience or commitment — in fact, I feel like laughing when self-righteous journalists question politicians about their integrity.